For many OEMs, manufacturing decisions are surprisingly permanent.
A company either builds an in-house production capability because that’s what is needed at the time, or it outsources to an EMS supplier from the beginning because establishing a manufacturing operation wasn’t commercially viable. Once that decision has been made, it often remains unchanged for years. Production continues, products ship, customers are served, and the question of whether the existing model is still the right one gradually moves into the background.
The problem is that the business environment rarely stands still for long enough to justify that level of complacency.
An electronics manufacturing strategy that was the obvious choice five years ago may not be the best choice today. The company may have grown, product volumes may have increased, product complexity may have changed, and the wider supply chain is almost certainly different to the one that existed when the original decision was made. Yet many organisations never revisit the question because there is no obvious trigger to do so.
In reality, manufacturing strategy deserves the same level of scrutiny that businesses apply to finance systems, suppliers, logistics partners and commercial operations. Few organisations would continue using the same software platform, procurement strategy or distribution network indefinitely without evaluating whether it still met their needs. Electronics manufacturing should be viewed in exactly the same way.
The discussion around outsourcing is often framed too narrowly. It is frequently presented as a simple choice between retaining control through in-house production or reducing costs by sending work to an EMS supplier. In practice, the decision is significantly more nuanced than that.
Many OEMs initially outsource to a manufacturing partner because they cannot justify the investment required to manufacture products themselves. Modern electronics manufacturing requires specialised equipment, quality systems, skilled personnel, inventory management processes and continual investment in capability. For some companies, particularly those producing lower volumes or highly complex products, that level of commitment simply doesn’t make commercial sense.
However, cost is only one part of the equation.
In many cases, outsourcing becomes attractive because it allows an organisation to focus on the activities that genuinely differentiate the business. Customers rarely choose an OEM because it owns a pick-and-place machine or operates a surface mount line. They choose it because of its expertise, innovation, product performance and understanding of the market it serves. The value is often created through design, engineering, software development, customer relationships and technical knowledge rather than through the act of manufacturing itself.
That doesn’t mean manufacturing is unimportant. Far from it. Manufacturing is a critical part of delivering a quality product to market. The question is whether it needs to sit within the organisation in order to deliver that value.
This is where a feasibility study can provide enormous benefit.
The purpose of a manufacturing feasibility review should not be to justify outsourcing to an EMS supplier. Equally, it should not be undertaken with the expectation that in-house production is automatically superior. The objective is simply to determine whether the current arrangement continues to represent the best use of the organisation’s resources.
Unfortunately, many businesses never perform this analysis properly.
When comparing in-house production with outsourced manufacturing, management teams often focus on the most visible costs. Labour rates, factory floor space and equipment purchases tend to dominate the discussion because they are easy to identify. What receives far less attention are the secondary costs that accumulate over time. Equipment maintenance, calibration, software upgrades, inventory carrying costs, recruitment, training, quality management, compliance requirements and production support activities all consume resources, even though they may not appear directly on a production report.
The result is that some organisations believe they know the cost of manufacturing a product when, in reality, they only understand part of the picture.
A well-executed feasibility study forces businesses to look beyond these headline figures and examine the true cost of ownership associated with maintaining an in-house manufacturing capability. More importantly, it encourages management teams to consider factors that are difficult to quantify but can have a substantial impact on long-term competitiveness.
For example, if demand increased significantly next year, could production scale quickly enough to support growth? If a key manufacturing engineer left the business, how easily could that expertise be replaced? Are valuable engineering resources being devoted to solving production challenges when they could be focused on developing the next generation of products? Is capital being tied up in manufacturing assets that might earn a better return elsewhere in the business?
These are not always comfortable questions, but they are important ones.
Interestingly, some organisations undertake a feasibility study and conclude that keeping production in-house remains absolutely the right decision. Their volumes may justify the investment, their processes may provide a competitive advantage, or their product requirements may be better served by retaining direct control over electronics manufacturing operations.
That is a perfectly valid outcome.
The value lies in knowing that the decision has been tested rather than assumed.
Other organisations discover that an external manufacturing partner could provide access to capabilities, technology, purchasing power and supply-chain expertise that would be difficult or expensive to replicate internally. In those situations, outsourcing becomes a strategic decision rather than a cost-cutting exercise. The objective is no longer simply to reduce manufacturing expenditure but to improve resilience, increase flexibility and allow the business to concentrate on the activities that generate the greatest value.
An occasional feasibility review can help OEMs take an objective look at their manufacturing strategy, uncover hidden costs, identify opportunities for improvement and determine whether valuable resources are being focused in the right areas.
If that review indicates that outsourcing could deliver greater value, partnering with an experienced UK electronics manufacturer can make the transition straightforward. Camtronics supports OEMs with manufacturing expertise, engineering support, material management, testing, traceability and quality-controlled production, enabling them to focus on product development, innovation and growth while maintaining confidence in their manufacturing operations.
Ultimately, manufacturing strategy should never be driven by habit. The businesses that achieve long-term success are those that regularly challenge their assumptions and ensure their operations continue to support their future ambitions.
1. How do I know if outsourcing electronics manufacturing is worth considering?
There is rarely a single trigger. Most OEMs begin exploring outsourcing to a manufacturing partner when they experience capacity constraints, increasing production costs, difficulties recruiting manufacturing staff, or the need for significant capital investment in equipment and facilities. However, even businesses that are operating successfully in-house should periodically assess whether their current model remains commercially and strategically effective.
2. What should be included in an electronics manufacturing feasibility study?
A thorough feasibility study should examine the total cost of manufacturing, including labour, equipment maintenance, facility costs, inventory, quality management, training and compliance activities. It should also evaluate strategic factors such as scalability, supply-chain resilience, engineering resource allocation and future investment requirements.
3. Is outsourcing electronics manufacturing only about reducing costs?
No. While cost can be a factor, many OEMs outsource because it allows them to focus more resources on product development, innovation, customer support and other activities that create competitive advantage. The decision to outsource to a manufacturing partner is often driven by strategic priorities as much as financial considerations.
4. Does outsourcing mean losing control over production?
Not necessarily. Modern EMS suppliers often offer detailed reporting, full traceability, dedicated account management and close collaboration throughout the manufacturing process. In many cases, OEMs gain greater visibility into production performance because of the systems and processes their manufacturing partner has in place.
5. How often should an OEM review its manufacturing strategy?
There is no fixed rule, but many organisations benefit from conducting a formal manufacturing review every three to five years, or whenever there is a significant change in product volumes, business growth, market conditions or capital investment requirements.
6. Should we outsource electronics manufacturing or keep production in-house?
The answer depends on your products, volumes, strategic priorities and long-term business objectives. Rather than assuming one approach is better than the other, OEMs should periodically review their manufacturing model and make decisions about EMS solutions using current operational and financial data. The best solution is the one that supports growth, quality, scalability and profitability for your specific business.
For more information about Camtronics, please explore our website or get in touch with our knowledgeable team to discuss your electronics manufacturing requirements.
“We have enjoyed an excellent commercial and technical relationship for 20 years with Camtronics. They have supported us in manufacturing and in continuously developing competitive products that keep us at the forefront of the industrial and automotive industry.”
Global industrial sensor & control company
“Throughout our ten-year partnership, we have always valued Camtronics’ commitment to flexibility and communication.
Their collaborative and proactive approach is a major benefit to us and we value the high quality of the increasing number of products they manufacture on our behalf”
Leading UK bio-pharma company
“Camtronics have handled small, one-off panel sample orders right through to large scale production volume orders … and deliveries have always been met.
Communication is a key aspect for us and we have entered into a strong working relationship, one that will hopefully last for a long time.”
Market leading industrial processing company
“We have been testing the ESC’s that you produced for us, and I am very happy to say that we have had zero rejects (Yes, that’s zero! Issues, faults or any trouble at all!). Honestly outstanding.
Technical Director
Safety, protection & compliance company